Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)

Revision as of 22:31, September 16, 2008

635 bytes added ,  22:31, September 16, 2008
reply to Brossa
Line 103: Line 103:  
:I therefore repeat my questions about points three and five, as stated previously. If you have other questions that I must answer first, please list them all at once, as I'm eager to move on to that discussion.--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 17:53, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:I therefore repeat my questions about points three and five, as stated previously. If you have other questions that I must answer first, please list them all at once, as I'm eager to move on to that discussion.--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 17:53, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
    +
:: It's foolish to debate someone who has already closed his mind.  Point 1 is plainly correct: the PNAS article should admit and disclose that the false hypothesis was indeed proven to be false.  If you stand behind the falsehood, then you'll refuse to admit other errors also.
 +
 +
:: Your refusal to concede point 2 is even more egregious.  Lenski combined his experiments, and you can't claim that combination was simultaneously correct and incorrect.  Moreover, the lack of scale also exists between Experiment 2 and 3, again disproving the underlying thesis of the paper.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:31, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
    
== Please provide your statistical analysis ==
 
== Please provide your statistical analysis ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,622

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/518338"

Navigation menu