Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 145: Line 145:     
: Christian theologians hold the equivalent of PhDs, and yet you reject the conclusion of those "experts".  I have found nothing in Lenski's published background to indicate any expertise by him in statistics.  Yet you accept Lenski's view on statistics without even thinking through the issues on your own, while rejecting the consensus of Christian experts.  Why?  The answer is obvious: bias and lack of open-mindedness.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:25, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 
: Christian theologians hold the equivalent of PhDs, and yet you reject the conclusion of those "experts".  I have found nothing in Lenski's published background to indicate any expertise by him in statistics.  Yet you accept Lenski's view on statistics without even thinking through the issues on your own, while rejecting the consensus of Christian experts.  Why?  The answer is obvious: bias and lack of open-mindedness.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:25, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: Biological studies routinely require at least some application of statistical theory, especially when studying populations of organisms or molecules which molecular (and evolutionary) biology usually involves. Biostatistics (the statistical theories commonly used in biomedicine) is often a required course for PhD students for this reason. Established researchers in the life sciences do not need to have a degree in statistics to indicate expertise - Lenski's publication record itself indicates that he has successfully applied statistical theory in his analyses many times. At any rate, if someone can simply claim without proof that he has taken (and understood) statistics courses on the level needed to evaluate Lenski's paper, then he has no basis on which to accuse others of lacking expertise.
    
==Clarification on peer review and anonymity==
 
==Clarification on peer review and anonymity==
3

edits

Navigation menu