1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 16:
Line 16: − +
→Contemporary Sensibility of Biblical Prohibition
==Contemporary Sensibility of Biblical Prohibition==
==Contemporary Sensibility of Biblical Prohibition==
The examples given to justify the validity of the Biblical law are not good justifications for avoiding sex during menstruation. The Neuberger quote is based on 1910 medicine, and lumps concerns about venereal disease and leprosy in the same pronouncement regarding menstruation. The Ben-Noun quote is specifically addressing the development of chlamydial and gonococcal diseases. Neither of these presents a contemporary medical reason why sex during menstruation between a healthy married couple would be wrong, even if the Biblical prohibition says it is. This goes back to my question above - what makes this Biblical prohibition from the Old Testament is valid in all cases while others like Kosher dietary restrictions can be ignored by Christians? --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 20:08, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
The examples given to justify the validity of the Biblical law are not good justifications for avoiding sex during menstruation. The Neuberger quote is based on 1910 medicine, and lumps concerns about venereal disease and leprosy in the same pronouncement regarding menstruation. The Ben-Noun quote is specifically addressing the development of chlamydial and gonococcal diseases. Neither of these presents a contemporary medical reason why sex during menstruation between a healthy married couple would be wrong, even if the Biblical prohibition says it is. This goes back to my question above - what makes this Biblical prohibition from the Old Testament valid in all cases while others like Kosher dietary restrictions can be ignored by Christians? --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 20:08, 7 October 2008 (EDT)