nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: − + +
→Origin of the universe: "nothing" is accurate
==Origin of the universe==
==Origin of the universe==
The scientific theory on the origin of the universe isn't that it "erupted from nothing", but that a quantum singularity burst outwards because of an explosion created from the immense pressure and heat. I've changed the article, but the citation is still something that twists the idea into something it isn't.
The scientific theory on the origin of the universe isn't that it "erupted from nothing", but that a quantum singularity burst outwards because of an explosion created from the immense pressure and heat. I've changed the article, but the citation is still something that twists the idea into something it isn't. {{unsigned|Grapes}}
: The citation is explaining the view of a Big Bang ''expert'', so can't be said to be "twisting" the idea. And a singularity is something that has no dimensions—i.e. it's synonymous with ''nothing''. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:24, 8 October 2008 (EDT)