Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
189 bytes added ,  18:48, October 14, 2008
Line 121: Line 121:  
This paragraph is complete liberal bias and should be removed--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 22:55, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 
This paragraph is complete liberal bias and should be removed--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 22:55, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
   −
JP, I have made a few edits, albeit minor ones, to some existing pages so as to honor the 90/10 policy.  My apologies for not taking note earlier.  I'm in the process of making more edits.  As for this paragraph, I'm a little wary of removing something like this (granted, it's not here anymore so I can't see what it said) because there was a lot of controversy surrounding McCain's fundraising protocol that was addressed by both liberal and credible sources.  Do we really want to sweep something under the rug because it doesn't look pretty?  That's stooping to liberal level... [[User:Acwellman|Acwellman]] 14:47, 14 October 2008 (EDT)
+
JP, I have made a few edits, albeit minor ones, to some existing pages so as to honor the 90/10 policy.  My apologies for not taking note earlier.  I'm in the process of making more edits.  As for this paragraph, I'm a little wary of removing something like this (granted, it's not here anymore so I can't see what it said) because there was a lot of controversy surrounding McCain's fundraising protocol that was addressed by both liberal and credible sources.  Do we really want to sweep something under the rug because it doesn't look pretty?  That's stooping to liberal level...Even Wikipedia addresses the apparently negative aspects surrounding Democratic figureheads, thus if we don't do the same, my concern is that we are going to be seen as less than Wikipedia. [[User:Acwellman|Acwellman]] 14:47, 14 October 2008 (EDT)
    
==Re: Reversion==
 
==Re: Reversion==
35

edits

Navigation menu