604
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 418:
Line 418: + + + +
Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse (view source)
Revision as of 19:20, October 14, 2008
, 19:20, October 14, 2008→Bugler, and Everyone Else Who Ignores
As to Sam's complaint of abuse of power by the admins as stated above, including myself, I am going to take that for action. Changes do need to be made, and made quickly. Editors need to realize that edits can only go so far, and conflicts need to be resolved respectfully and in a civil manner; sysops need to be more even-handed, and learn to take a time out; they also need to have valid reasons in blocking. Simply "not liking someone" isn't it. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:49, 12 October 2008 (EDT)
As to Sam's complaint of abuse of power by the admins as stated above, including myself, I am going to take that for action. Changes do need to be made, and made quickly. Editors need to realize that edits can only go so far, and conflicts need to be resolved respectfully and in a civil manner; sysops need to be more even-handed, and learn to take a time out; they also need to have valid reasons in blocking. Simply "not liking someone" isn't it. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:49, 12 October 2008 (EDT)
The arbitrary enforcement of the 90/10 rule is a nuisance on its own. But this act of creative calculation is even more embarrassing:
<blockquote>14:29, 14 October 2008 Bugler (Talk | contribs) blocked KarlJaeger (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 day (account creation disabled) (Violated 90/10 rule against talk, talk, talk)</blockquote>
(See [[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Bugler#Calculation_of_the_90.2F10_ratio here]]) --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:20, 14 October 2008 (EDT)