17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + +
no edit summary
:::Not so sure about that. I think the reasoning is more that since the Bible (as they interpret it) is true, good science ought to agree with it. Therefore, it ought to be possible to come up with a coherent, scientific model of, say, a young Earth. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 10:15, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Not so sure about that. I think the reasoning is more that since the Bible (as they interpret it) is true, good science ought to agree with it. Therefore, it ought to be possible to come up with a coherent, scientific model of, say, a young Earth. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 10:15, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::::Interesting possibility. You should add it to the article as an alternative perspective, like, "Alternately," or something.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 10:16, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::::Interesting possibility. You should add it to the article as an alternative perspective, like, "Alternately," or something.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 10:16, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Can anyone name a creation scientist?--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 01:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT)