444
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + +
no edit summary
Can anyone name a creation scientist?--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 01:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Can anyone name a creation scientist?--[[User:Eljoe2|Eljoe2]] 01:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:I can see two problems with Creation Science - though I won't be the first to mention this. The first is that science must be objective to be called science. If your objective is to prove a idea which you already hold then, strictly speaking, it can't be science. The second problem is that one of the axioms of the scientific method is: "All hypotheses and theories are in principle subject to disproof". As self-identified "Creation Scientists" I assume that they are unable to suggest circumstances which would cause them to change their ideas - and consequently can't be scientists.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 08:06, 23 March 2007 (EDT)