Automoderated users, edit
1,837
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 371:
Line 371: +
Conservapedia talk:Editing article and talk pages (view source)
Revision as of 04:11, October 17, 2008
, 04:11, October 17, 2008→References: Formatting is not a huge issue for me.
:--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:58, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
:--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:58, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
:: See (and contribute) [[Conservapedia talk:Footnotes - technical help|here]]. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:19, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
:: See (and contribute) [[Conservapedia talk:Footnotes - technical help|here]]. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:19, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
:::Wow - thanks - but that's a little overwhelming, details-wise. I'm not sure at this stage of the game Conservapedia can reach that high. I guess my main concern is that there ''are'' references given (because more often than not there are none at all, even when the author seems to have used a reference (or even copied word-for-word from one)), and ideally that there is more than just the URL included in them (which is not usually the case at this point). I'm not that fussy about format at this point - if the obvious information gets in there, I'll be happy.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 00:11, 17 October 2008 (EDT)