4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
= Content Disputes =
= Content Disputes =
==Relevance of introductory information?==
Why:
a) is it relevant that Jimmy Wales is an atheist, when no mention is made that the majority of users here seem to have a strong creationist, Christian bias?
b) is there no information about the Brittanica-Wikipedia assessment that showed wikipedia to be of similar general accuracy?
c) do numerous arguments on the wikipedia article rely on the argument that anyone can edit the various articles, when, in fact, the majority of this encylopaedia's articles can be edited by anyone?
==Sources==
==Sources==
If you follow the link to Cecil DeMille's wikipedia entry you'll notice that the trivia section is gone ... you should be careful to use references that are constantly being updated as they might not always prove your point.
If you follow the link to Cecil DeMille's wikipedia entry you'll notice that the trivia section is gone ... you should be careful to use references that are constantly being updated as they might not always prove your point.