4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 8:
Line 8: +
→Relevance of introductory information?
b) is there no information about the Brittanica-Wikipedia assessment that showed wikipedia to be of similar general accuracy?
b) is there no information about the Brittanica-Wikipedia assessment that showed wikipedia to be of similar general accuracy?
c) do numerous arguments on the wikipedia article rely on the argument that anyone can edit the various articles, when, in fact, the majority of this encylopaedia's articles can be edited by anyone?
c) do numerous arguments on the wikipedia article rely on the argument that anyone can edit the various articles, when, in fact, the majority of this encylopaedia's articles can be edited by anyone?
d) is there no mention of Conservapedia's reliance on Wikipedia's principles?
==Sources==
==Sources==