| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | Why: | | Why: |
| | | | |
| − | a) is it relevant that Jimmy Wales is an atheist, when no mention is made that the majority of users here seem to have a strong creationist, Christian bias? | + | - a) is it relevant that Jimmy Wales is an atheist, when no mention is made that the majority of users here seem to have a strong creationist, Christian bias? |
| − | b) is there no information about the Brittanica-Wikipedia assessment that showed wikipedia to be of similar general accuracy? | + | - b) is there no information about the Brittanica-Wikipedia assessment that showed wikipedia to be of similar general accuracy? |
| − | c) do numerous arguments on the wikipedia article rely on the argument that anyone can edit the various articles, when, in fact, the majority of this encylopaedia's articles can be edited by anyone? | + | - c) do numerous arguments on the wikipedia article rely on the argument that anyone can edit the various articles, when, in fact, the majority of this encylopaedia's articles can be edited by anyone? |
| − | d) is there no mention of Conservapedia's reliance on Wikipedia's principles? | + | - d) is there no mention of Conservapedia's reliance on Wikipedia's principles? |
| | | | |
| | ==Sources== | | ==Sources== |