nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 449:
Line 449: + Line 454:
Line 455: +
Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse (view source)
Revision as of 01:37, October 22, 2008
, 01:37, October 22, 2008→Bugler, and Everyone Else Who Ignores: What's that then?
:::Truer words have rarely been said. [[User:BrianA|BrianA]] 08:52, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
:::Truer words have rarely been said. [[User:BrianA|BrianA]] 08:52, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
::::BRichtigen, the fact that Philip for once didn't stick his nose in in this matter shows that it is not only I who see you as a troublemaker. You would be well advised to tread carefully, and not to spread dissent amongst a rabble of leftist malcontents, saboteurs, infiltrators and parodists. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:56, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
::::BRichtigen, the fact that Philip for once didn't stick his nose in in this matter shows that it is not only I who see you as a troublemaker. You would be well advised to tread carefully, and not to spread dissent amongst a rabble of leftist malcontents, saboteurs, infiltrators and parodists. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:56, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::: If I didn't "stick [my] nose in", then what's that from me two posts above yours? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:37, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::Can we try to keep this page a place to report and discuss abuse allegations and not a place to practice it? [[User:Corry|Corry]] 11:57, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::Can we try to keep this page a place to report and discuss abuse allegations and not a place to practice it? [[User:Corry|Corry]] 11:57, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::::Blocking those who specifically accuse you of abusing your authority is an unprofessional conflict of interests. Obviously you're not going to side with the people who are accusing you of abuse, therefore a non biased third party should be involved in mediating these conflicts, not "I've got the banhammer, so I win" kind of exchanges.--[[User:IanG|IanG]] 12:35, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::::Blocking those who specifically accuse you of abusing your authority is an unprofessional conflict of interests. Obviously you're not going to side with the people who are accusing you of abuse, therefore a non biased third party should be involved in mediating these conflicts, not "I've got the banhammer, so I win" kind of exchanges.--[[User:IanG|IanG]] 12:35, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
This entire section is a most unedifying display of intimidatory, gang mentality. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:47, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
This entire section is a most unedifying display of intimidatory, gang mentality. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:47, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
:: No, it's a complaint about alleged abuse. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:37, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
<ol><li>On a lighter note: I'd think that everyone would applaud spreading ''dissent amongst a rabble of leftist malcontents, saboteurs, infiltrators and parodists.''
<ol><li>On a lighter note: I'd think that everyone would applaud spreading ''dissent amongst a rabble of leftist malcontents, saboteurs, infiltrators and parodists.''