5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 90:
Line 90: + +
→United States
:::::::You are correct, the liberal agenda sources, let me rephrase, anti-American sources are no good. While we cite NYT and WaPo sometimes, we avoid liberal hate site like Huffington and Daily Kos. This is not a neutral site, it is from a Conservative viewpoint. This is not an American bash site either. You want to be fair, you want balance, I want Conservatism. I don't have to explain the complete bias of Shamnesty Intl. and HRW is a homosexual rights organization. If I don't know the source, no HelpJazz, you can add it. If I know it to be liberal, I will point it out everytime. We can't use it... sounds condescending. I am not gestapo of CP. I have been known to back down on issues where I HAVE BEEN WRONG. --'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 17:42, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::::You are correct, the liberal agenda sources, let me rephrase, anti-American sources are no good. While we cite NYT and WaPo sometimes, we avoid liberal hate site like Huffington and Daily Kos. This is not a neutral site, it is from a Conservative viewpoint. This is not an American bash site either. You want to be fair, you want balance, I want Conservatism. I don't have to explain the complete bias of Shamnesty Intl. and HRW is a homosexual rights organization. If I don't know the source, no HelpJazz, you can add it. If I know it to be liberal, I will point it out everytime. We can't use it... sounds condescending. I am not gestapo of CP. I have been known to back down on issues where I HAVE BEEN WRONG. --'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 17:42, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
::::::::Well said, Jp. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:45, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
::::::::Well said, Jp. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:45, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::::::That's complete junk. If you are asserting that those sites are ''lying'', then fine, there's no need to use them. If you think those sources are telling the ''truth'', but don't hold your conservative values (which I guess is your definition of anti-American?), then it's plain dishonest to not use them. I never said I wanted balance; I want ''honesty''. If you can't have a conservative site without honesty, I think that does more of a disservice to the site than having "anti-American" sources. I have been wrong too, but I'm ''not'' wrong in saying that the assumption that any liberal organization must be anti-American is incredibly faulty and does a disservice to Conservapedia and the conservative values it represents. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:36, 24 October 2008 (EDT)