:::::::::That's complete junk. If you are asserting that those sites are ''lying'', then fine, there's no need to use them. If you think those sources are telling the ''truth'', but don't hold your conservative values (which I guess is your definition of anti-American?), then it's plain dishonest to not use them. I never said I wanted balance; I want ''honesty''. If you can't have a conservative site without honesty, I think that does more of a disservice to the site than having "anti-American" sources. I have been wrong too, but I'm ''not'' wrong in saying that the assumption that any liberal organization must be anti-American is incredibly faulty and does a disservice to Conservapedia and the conservative values it represents. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:36, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | :::::::::That's complete junk. If you are asserting that those sites are ''lying'', then fine, there's no need to use them. If you think those sources are telling the ''truth'', but don't hold your conservative values (which I guess is your definition of anti-American?), then it's plain dishonest to not use them. I never said I wanted balance; I want ''honesty''. If you can't have a conservative site without honesty, I think that does more of a disservice to the site than having "anti-American" sources. I have been wrong too, but I'm ''not'' wrong in saying that the assumption that any liberal organization must be anti-American is incredibly faulty and does a disservice to Conservapedia and the conservative values it represents. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:36, 24 October 2008 (EDT) |