nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + +
Talk:Biblical accuracy (view source)
Revision as of 02:30, October 31, 2008
, 02:30, October 31, 2008That's not always a given.
Re:Luke. He was a good historian because he wrote about his contemporary time? Lolwut? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 11:16, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
Re:Luke. He was a good historian because he wrote about his contemporary time? Lolwut? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 11:16, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
:* Writing about the time that one knows is not a guarantee of being accurate.
:* Many have disputed that the Bible was accurate, so Luke's accuracy is a valid point to make.
:* Most if not all of the Bible was written by contemporaries. So you'd agree that the entire Bible is accurate? (I do).
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:30, 30 October 2008 (EDT)