604
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 467:
Line 467: + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse (view source)
Revision as of 19:27, November 4, 2008
, 19:27, November 4, 2008Block of Jonsen
I'm feeling relieved that Philip J. Rayment as an administrator stated <i> "No, ''Mind your own business'' is not a reasonable answer, the second block appears unjustified, and the quote from Martin Niemoeller is very apt."</i><p>
I'm feeling relieved that Philip J. Rayment as an administrator stated <i> "No, ''Mind your own business'' is not a reasonable answer, the second block appears unjustified, and the quote from Martin Niemoeller is very apt."</i><p>
But the procedure of appealing a block is somewhat lacking: writing a complaint on an abuse site and waiting that some sysops may (or may not) answer does work for a small blog with a couple of writers, but this is a wiki with some 20,000 registered editors. IMO it's to huge to rely on such informal a method... Especially the less prolific editors - like me - may fear to be ignored. --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 14:18, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
But the procedure of appealing a block is somewhat lacking: writing a complaint on an abuse site and waiting that some sysops may (or may not) answer does work for a small blog with a couple of writers, but this is a wiki with some 20,000 registered editors. IMO it's to huge to rely on such informal a method... Especially the less prolific editors - like me - may fear to be ignored. --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 14:18, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
==Block of Jonsen==
I seem to be the single contributor to this page, but nevertheless:
Ed Poor blocked Jonsen because of "(misuse of {{fact}} tags)". But Jonsen never ''used'' any fact-tags.
Fact is: ''I'' inserted fact-tags in an [[Belief_in_evolution | article]] of Ed Poor, and as far as I can see, I was the only one to do so in one of the last articles of Ed Poor. As these tags were not reverted, I suppose that they aren't misused.
So, the block of Jonsen is factually wrong, a block of me would be just plain wrong :-) --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 14:27, 4 November 2008 (EST)