726
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 471:
Line 471: − + Line 497:
Line 497: + +
Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse (view source)
Revision as of 20:41, November 4, 2008
, 20:41, November 4, 2008→Block of user:Jonsen
I seem to be the single contributor to this page, but nevertheless:
I seem to be the single contributor to this page, but nevertheless:
Ed Poor blocked Jonsen because of "(misuse of {{fact}} tags)". But Jonsen never ''used'' any fact-tags.
Ed Poor blocked Jonsen because of "(misuse of <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags)". But Jonsen never ''used'' any fact-tags.
Fact is: ''I'' inserted fact-tags in an [[Belief_in_evolution | article]] of Ed Poor, and as far as I can see, I was the only one to do so in one of the last articles of Ed Poor. As these tags were not reverted, I suppose that they aren't misused.
Fact is: ''I'' inserted fact-tags in an [[Belief_in_evolution | article]] of Ed Poor, and as far as I can see, I was the only one to do so in one of the last articles of Ed Poor. As these tags were not reverted, I suppose that they aren't misused.
If I've expelled someone by mistake, restore them (or show me how it will save us time if I restore them.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:43, 4 November 2008 (EST)
If I've expelled someone by mistake, restore them (or show me how it will save us time if I restore them.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:43, 4 November 2008 (EST)
:It has been done. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:54, 4 November 2008 (EST)
:It has been done. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:54, 4 November 2008 (EST)
I nowikied the above use of the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tag so that this page doesn't show up in the "sources needed" (something like that, I can't remember) category. I'm always worried about getting in trouble here, to be honest, so just to be clear, should we not use the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 15:41, 4 November 2008 (EST)