nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 488:
Line 488: + Line 498:
Line 499: +
Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse (view source)
Revision as of 09:22, November 5, 2008
, 09:22, November 5, 2008→Block of user:Jonsen: Bugler was fair; I've undone the other one.
:::Of course, had you done the responsible thing and asked the relevant party about it, there would be nothing to bring up in our daily meeding of the BBC, would there? I'm not fabricating anything here. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:00, 4 November 2008 (EST)
:::Of course, had you done the responsible thing and asked the relevant party about it, there would be nothing to bring up in our daily meeding of the BBC, would there? I'm not fabricating anything here. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:00, 4 November 2008 (EST)
::::I didn't need to ask anyone anything. Ed's intentions were perfectly clear, and that's good enough for me. And I'm sure the BBC wouldn't fall down on finding ''something''. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:14, 4 November 2008 (EST)
::::I didn't need to ask anyone anything. Ed's intentions were perfectly clear, and that's good enough for me. And I'm sure the BBC wouldn't fall down on finding ''something''. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:14, 4 November 2008 (EST)
::::: Although I wouldn't have done what Bugler did, in simply ''transferring'' a block given to the wrong person, he does have a reasonable case here, HelpJazz. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:21, 5 November 2008 (EST)
::::I was going to do it later. Then I asked for help and was pointedly refused. That is anti-collobaration.
::::I was going to do it later. Then I asked for help and was pointedly refused. That is anti-collobaration.
If I've expelled someone by mistake, restore them (or show me how it will save us time if I restore them.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:43, 4 November 2008 (EST)
If I've expelled someone by mistake, restore them (or show me how it will save us time if I restore them.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:43, 4 November 2008 (EST)
:It has been done. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:54, 4 November 2008 (EST)
:It has been done. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:54, 4 November 2008 (EST)
:: You did Jonsen, I've done BRichtigen. Maliciously peppering articles with {{tl|fact}} tags is blockable. Otherwise, there's nothing wrong with it, and it's going to be easier for the original poster to find the figures than for another person. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:21, 5 November 2008 (EST)
I nowikied the above use of the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tag so that this page doesn't show up in the "sources needed" (something like that, I can't remember) category. I'm always worried about getting in trouble here, to be honest, so just to be clear, should we not use the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 15:41, 4 November 2008 (EST)
I nowikied the above use of the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tag so that this page doesn't show up in the "sources needed" (something like that, I can't remember) category. I'm always worried about getting in trouble here, to be honest, so just to be clear, should we not use the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 15:41, 4 November 2008 (EST)