SkipCaptcha
175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 151:
Line 151: + +
Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math (view source)
Revision as of 22:20, November 5, 2008
, 22:20, November 5, 2008Reductio ad absurdum
::Unlikely. But I'm in. [[User:BrianA|BrianA]] 10:10, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
::Unlikely. But I'm in. [[User:BrianA|BrianA]] 10:10, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
* I think that denying the value of reduction ad absurdum is blasphemous, since the Bible makes abundant use of it. The Book of Ecclesiastes and Paul's letters, for example, use this method. [[User:Sunda62|Sunda62]] 17:20, 5 November 2008 (EST)