416
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + + + + + +
WWJD ~~~~
One way might be to note if the officers who were not convicted were dismissed anyway. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 15:43, 6 November 2008 (EST)
One way might be to note if the officers who were not convicted were dismissed anyway. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 15:43, 6 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::: "It is clear from your post that you are not a lawyer." "once you lost an argument ("Did all four men beat him?") you changed the subject ("We can say they "beat" him if they watched him get beaten.") That's just a silly tactic." "If that hurts your feelings, then you should avoid making assertions in fields about which you know little, such as criminal law." Not only would I consider those personal attacks, they're also rather patronizing. Don;t you have racist articles to edit anyway? [[User:SamuelA|SamuelA]] 15:46, 6 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::: "It is clear from your post that you are not a lawyer." "once you lost an argument ("Did all four men beat him?") you changed the subject ("We can say they "beat" him if they watched him get beaten.") That's just a silly tactic." "If that hurts your feelings, then you should avoid making assertions in fields about which you know little, such as criminal law." Not only would I consider those personal attacks, they're also rather patronizing. Don;t you have racist articles to edit anyway? [[User:SamuelA|SamuelA]] 15:46, 6 November 2008 (EST)
I will not engage with you (on this page) about what you consider personal attacks and what I consider your oversensitivity. This page is for discussion of the [[Rodney King]] article. I will happily discuss that.
If you think it is racist, I hope you will say how, instead of wiki-accusing me of racism.
Nonetheless, I will turn the other cheek. [[WWJD]]? [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 15:56, 6 November 2008 (EST)