25
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: +
→Nov 6 changes
One way might be to note if the officers who were not convicted were dismissed anyway. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 15:43, 6 November 2008 (EST)
One way might be to note if the officers who were not convicted were dismissed anyway. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 15:43, 6 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::: "It is clear from your post that you are not a lawyer." "once you lost an argument ("Did all four men beat him?") you changed the subject ("We can say they "beat" him if they watched him get beaten.") That's just a silly tactic." "If that hurts your feelings, then you should avoid making assertions in fields about which you know little, such as criminal law." Not only would I consider those personal attacks, they're also rather patronizing. Don;t you have racist articles to edit anyway? [[User:SamuelA|SamuelA]] 15:46, 6 November 2008 (EST)