29
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
I'm not going to repeat myself. Also, please don't post such poorly written comments to my talk page again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:41, 13 November 2008 (EST)
I'm not going to repeat myself. Also, please don't post such poorly written comments to my talk page again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:41, 13 November 2008 (EST)
== My revisions to Obama article ==
You didn't read my edits on the talk page did you? By leaving the muslim part on top and under the contents your really are pushing the subject off as fact rather then theory. Thats a form of [[deceit]] that only liberals use shouldn't we conseratives be above this? It's also ugly considering it's into the section thats supposed to be a intro. Also looking at other pages of people who also ran for election that year there pages have a potrait of themselves up top. Obama's page has it all the way towards the middle. I think by not switching those pictures it strongly shows bias the same kind of bias that this enclyopedia was made to fight. Reply back to my talk page. I don't want to have to keep coming back to yours.--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 09:28, 13 November 2008 (EST)
*How exactly are they insulting? How is my approach misguided? Instead of threatening me with blocking can you actually argue agaisnt or answer what my points are? Can we comprimise on the article?--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 09:35, 13 November 2008 (EST)
== Here Aschlafly ==
*Sorry if they're not written perfectly I didn't have the luxury of being home schooled. They're on my talk page now so you don't have to see them if they insult you. But you still haven't answered any of the points I made and instead your threatening me to silence any questions or oppositions I have. Silencing opposition like that isn't something us conservatives should do. I'm still asking for a compromise on the Obama article.--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 09:49, 13 November 2008 (EST)