User talk:Vmember

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links


Hello, Vmember, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Vmember!

I would take a look at the talk page and history of the Obama article before you make big changes. Many of them have been tried before, and the results haven't been very pretty... HelpJazz 13:38, 12 November 2008 (EST)

One more reversion ...

One more reversion and your account will be blocked. Godspeed.--Aschlafly 09:19, 13 November 2008 (EST)

Your comments on my talk page are insulting and filled with grammatical-type errors. Contribute to other entries to show you want to improve this encyclopedia, then let's talk. Your account will be blocked in you persist in your current misguided approach.--Aschlafly 09:31, 13 November 2008 (EST)

I'm not going to repeat myself. Also, please don't post such poorly written comments to my talk page again.--Aschlafly 09:41, 13 November 2008 (EST)

My revisions to Obama article

You didn't read my edits on the talk page did you? By leaving the muslim part on top and under the contents your really are pushing the subject off as fact rather then theory. Thats a form of deceit that only liberals use shouldn't we conseratives be above this? It's also ugly considering it's into the section thats supposed to be a intro. Also looking at other pages of people who also ran for election that year there pages have a potrait of themselves up top. Obama's page has it all the way towards the middle. I think by not switching those pictures it strongly shows bias the same kind of bias that this enclyopedia was made to fight. Reply back to my talk page. I don't want to have to keep coming back to yours.--Vmember 09:28, 13 November 2008 (EST)

  • How exactly are they insulting? How is my approach misguided? Instead of threatening me with blocking can you actually argue agaisnt or answer what my points are? Can we comprimise on the article?--Vmember 09:35, 13 November 2008 (EST)

Here Aschlafly

  • Sorry if they're not written perfectly I didn't have the luxury of being home schooled. They're on my talk page now so you don't have to see them if they insult you. But you still haven't answered any of the points I made and instead your threatening me to silence any questions or oppositions I have. Silencing opposition like that isn't something us conservatives should do. I'm still asking for a compromise on the Obama article.--Vmember 09:49, 13 November 2008 (EST)
Compromise? The truth isn't democratic. You've added nothing to this encyclopedia, but instead have obstructed and tried to inject liberal bias while claiming to be a 'conservative'. Do you have nothing better to do? RodWeathers 13:12, 13 November 2008 (EST)
Your statement would be relevant, Rodweathers, if everything on the Obama article was fact. We do not know that to be true, which is why this discussion exists in the first place.--JArneal 19:41, 13 November 2008 (EST)