359
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: +
→Here Aschlafly
*Sorry if they're not written perfectly I didn't have the luxury of being home schooled. They're on my talk page now so you don't have to see them if they insult you. But you still haven't answered any of the points I made and instead your threatening me to silence any questions or oppositions I have. Silencing opposition like that isn't something us conservatives should do. I'm still asking for a compromise on the Obama article.--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 09:49, 13 November 2008 (EST)
*Sorry if they're not written perfectly I didn't have the luxury of being home schooled. They're on my talk page now so you don't have to see them if they insult you. But you still haven't answered any of the points I made and instead your threatening me to silence any questions or oppositions I have. Silencing opposition like that isn't something us conservatives should do. I'm still asking for a compromise on the Obama article.--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 09:49, 13 November 2008 (EST)
: Compromise? The truth isn't democratic. You've added nothing to this encyclopedia, but instead have obstructed and tried to inject liberal bias while claiming to be a 'conservative'. Do you have nothing better to do? [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 13:12, 13 November 2008 (EST)
: Compromise? The truth isn't democratic. You've added nothing to this encyclopedia, but instead have obstructed and tried to inject liberal bias while claiming to be a 'conservative'. Do you have nothing better to do? [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 13:12, 13 November 2008 (EST)
::Your statement would be relevant, Rodweathers, if everything on the Obama article was fact. We do not know that to be true, which is why this discussion exists in the first place.--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 19:41, 13 November 2008 (EST)