Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
310 bytes added ,  21:50, November 14, 2008
Line 40: Line 40:  
::''I suggest we leave the four best examples (perhaps two liberal and two conservative)'' Absolutely not - that sort of moral relativism is the worst sort of Liberal deceit-mongering. In what sense is it rational for Conservapedia to promote the pretence that Liberalism is as moral as Conservatism? This wasn't in the Commandments when I last looked. Post Liberal biogotries to Conservative bigotries in the proportions that they are manifested in real life. I guarantee that the Liberal list would break the page before we get half a dozen examples by so-called conservatives. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:45, 14 November 2008 (EST)
 
::''I suggest we leave the four best examples (perhaps two liberal and two conservative)'' Absolutely not - that sort of moral relativism is the worst sort of Liberal deceit-mongering. In what sense is it rational for Conservapedia to promote the pretence that Liberalism is as moral as Conservatism? This wasn't in the Commandments when I last looked. Post Liberal biogotries to Conservative bigotries in the proportions that they are manifested in real life. I guarantee that the Liberal list would break the page before we get half a dozen examples by so-called conservatives. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:45, 14 November 2008 (EST)
 
:::Shall we then leave the format as is? [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 16:38, 14 November 2008 (EST)
 
:::Shall we then leave the format as is? [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 16:38, 14 November 2008 (EST)
 +
::::The format being a long list of examples? I think everyone has agreed that we are fine with examples, as long as they are good and don't try to hide the truth.
 +
::::Nobody has said anything about that second paragraph, though. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:50, 14 November 2008 (EST)
5,580

edits

Navigation menu