30
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: − ==2008 Presidential Race==+ − Democrats are worried that their candidate will fail to capture the Presidency and will likely use The Bradley effect as an explaination. <ref>[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/17/obama-benefit-reverse-bradley-effect-study-finds/ Study: Obama Could Benefit From 'Reverse Bradley Effect'] Fox News, October 17, 2008</ref>
→2008 Presidential Race
In California and other states, [[Barack Obama]] was leading in the polls to Hillary Clinton. In California's primary, Obama lost by a landslide 10 percentage points after a late survey showed him ahead by 13 points. The Bradley effect was invoked. <ref>[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/the_bradley_effect.html The Bradley Effect?] RealClearPolitics.com, February 11, 2008</ref> Political scientist Bethany Albertson used data from 32 Democratic primaries this year. She found evidence of the Bradley Effect in three states, California, New Hampshire and Rhode Island.
In California and other states, [[Barack Obama]] was leading in the polls to Hillary Clinton. In California's primary, Obama lost by a landslide 10 percentage points after a late survey showed him ahead by 13 points. The Bradley effect was invoked. <ref>[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/the_bradley_effect.html The Bradley Effect?] RealClearPolitics.com, February 11, 2008</ref> Political scientist Bethany Albertson used data from 32 Democratic primaries this year. She found evidence of the Bradley Effect in three states, California, New Hampshire and Rhode Island.
==References==
==References==