237
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 295:
Line 295: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Young Earth Creationism (view source)
Revision as of 14:18, November 16, 2008
, 14:18, November 16, 2008→Mutually exclusive: new section
* Alternatively, Rotskep was trying to provide an example of the silly arguments that evolutionists sometimes use, in which case it would only serve to confuse the flow of the text in having two different arguments in the one point, and refutations would need to be provided for both.
* Alternatively, Rotskep was trying to provide an example of the silly arguments that evolutionists sometimes use, in which case it would only serve to confuse the flow of the text in having two different arguments in the one point, and refutations would need to be provided for both.
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:41, 10 November 2008 (EST)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:41, 10 November 2008 (EST)
== Mutually exclusive ==
Claim one is essentially ''evolutionists cannot gather enough solid testable evidence to point us in one direction or another as to what happened long before we started observing, this is because it is impossible to''
Claim two is essentially ''The evidence we have gathered (it is implied atthis point that evidence means testable reliable, not guesses) points us in the direction of a young earth that started 6-10,000 years ago''
That's akin to stopping someone who is reading a sign that is a long ways away and saying "No you can't know that, no one can see that far, but here let me also show you by reading the sign and telling you what it really says" If someone said that to you you would point out that the two arguments for why you are wrong are mutually exclusive. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 09:18, 16 November 2008 (EST)