Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 295: Line 295:  
* Alternatively, Rotskep was trying to provide an example of the silly arguments that evolutionists sometimes use, in which case it would only serve to confuse the flow of the text in having two different arguments in the one point, and refutations would need to be provided for both.
 
* Alternatively, Rotskep was trying to provide an example of the silly arguments that evolutionists sometimes use, in which case it would only serve to confuse the flow of the text in having two different arguments in the one point, and refutations would need to be provided for both.
 
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:41, 10 November 2008 (EST)
 
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:41, 10 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:Are you assuming A Priory that all arguments for Evolution are incorrect? --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 09:20, 16 November 2008 (EST)
    
== Mutually exclusive ==
 
== Mutually exclusive ==
237

edits

Navigation menu