Changes

::<!--Ed, I don't think I've ever seen you use an asterix before in that way-->Oh, wait: I misread it. "liberal bias is a concept, not a person" --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 20:18, 16 November 2008 (EST)

::<!--Ed, I don't think I've ever seen you use an asterix before in that way-->Oh, wait: I misread it. "liberal bias is a concept, not a person" --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 20:18, 16 November 2008 (EST)

:Wait, his bot is going to add everything from the "liberals" "liberalism" and "liberal organizations" categories and dump them all together into a "liberal" category? Why? Aren't categories supposed to be nouns? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:21, 16 November 2008 (EST)

:::Wait, his bot is going to add everything from the "liberals" "liberalism" and "liberal organizations" categories and dump them all together into a "liberal" category? Why? Aren't categories supposed to be nouns? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:21, 16 November 2008 (EST)

::[[Homosexual Agenda]] is under the subcategory [[:Category:Liberal Deceit]]. [[Evolution]] isn't under any of the liberal categories at all.  It doesn't usually make sense to put everything on a template into the same category.  It makes category renames easier, but everything else harder, and category renames don't happen that often.  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 20:26, 16 November 2008 (EST)

:::::[[Homosexual Agenda]] is under the subcategory [[:Category:Liberal Deceit]]. [[Evolution]] isn't under any of the liberal categories at all.  It doesn't usually make sense to put everything on a template into the same category.  It makes category renames easier, but everything else harder, and category renames don't happen that often.  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 20:26, 16 November 2008 (EST)

:(EC) <s>Ed, "liberal bias in acedemia", which is the title of the article, is not a person. There might be people mentioned in the article, but do you seriously want to put every single article that so much as mentions a liberal into the "liberals" category? That would mean that, for example, [[John McCain]] would be in the liberals category.</s> (EC -- this is happening a lot today. Maybe I should increase my typing speed) I think you understand where I'm coming from now. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:21, 16 November 2008 (EST)

::::(EC) <s>Ed, "liberal bias in acedemia", which is the title of the article, is not a person. There might be people mentioned in the article, but do you seriously want to put every single article that so much as mentions a liberal into the "liberals" category? That would mean that, for example, [[John McCain]] would be in the liberals category.</s> (EC -- this is happening a lot today. Maybe I should increase my typing speed) I think you understand where I'm coming from now. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:21, 16 November 2008 (EST)

::You and Interiot are indeed "understood".  I merely suggested one way to quickly add articles to a category, was not suggesting that would be the ONLY category applied.  To me it was far easier to change the category "Liberal'''s'''" to Liberal, no plural.  The "discussion-without-end" over this is everything that is wrong about Conservapedia, and in my opinion, by design and spite.  However, if people want to run around like a chicken with its head cut off, in spite, go ahead. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font>^{<font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font>} 20:32, 16 November 2008 (EST)

:::::You and Interiot are indeed "understood".  I merely suggested one way to quickly add articles to a category, was not suggesting that would be the ONLY category applied.  To me it was far easier to change the category "Liberal'''s'''" to Liberal, no plural.  The "discussion-without-end" over this is everything that is wrong about Conservapedia, and in my opinion, by design and spite.  However, if people want to run around like a chicken with its head cut off, in spite, go ahead. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font>^{<font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font>} 20:32, 16 November 2008 (EST)

:::Easier isn't always best. It might be "easier" to just put everything in the "liberal" category but (a) it goes against the category conventions and (b) it's not very descriptive.

::::::Easier isn't always best. It might be "easier" to just put everything in the "liberal" category but (a) it goes against the category conventions and (b) it's not very descriptive.

::I don't see who's running around with a chicken with it's head cut off, either. All I was doing was putting articles into the most logical, pre-existing category. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:36, 16 November 2008 (EST)

::::::I don't see who's running around with a chicken with it's head cut off, either. All I was doing was putting articles into the most logical, pre-existing category. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:36, 16 November 2008 (EST)