4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 91:
Line 91: +
→Remove "ideologically motivated" tags
::::::If an article has no sources to support it, it deserves to look like one big citation tag. Not that I would make an article that way. But for a user who has found a number of sources to be criticized for putting fact tags on the article he edited is unfair. The article has lasted long enough for someone to find sources, anyway. --'' '''[[user:JArneal|<font color="#006666" >JArneal</font>]]''' '' 18:23, 18 November 2008 (EST)
::::::If an article has no sources to support it, it deserves to look like one big citation tag. Not that I would make an article that way. But for a user who has found a number of sources to be criticized for putting fact tags on the article he edited is unfair. The article has lasted long enough for someone to find sources, anyway. --'' '''[[user:JArneal|<font color="#006666" >JArneal</font>]]''' '' 18:23, 18 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::I think it's disturbing that you are blowing around a lot of talk. If the points are inaccurate, then disprove them! Did you consider that maybe the reason the article isn't crowded with citation tags is because the points are accepted to be true and the questionable ones have already been removed? We don't need citations for statements like "the sky is blue" or "Hilary is a liberal". -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 03:21, 19 November 2008 (EST)