178
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + + + + +
Talk:Nanotechnology (view source)
Revision as of 12:32, November 19, 2008
, 12:32, November 19, 2008Reply
::JohnD didn't "argue"--he just asked why his edit had been reverted. And he can't make corrections if he doesn't know what's wrong with the edit. Which is probably why he asked you why you reverted his edit.--[[User:RossC|RossC]] 13:30, 12 November 2008 (EST)
::JohnD didn't "argue"--he just asked why his edit had been reverted. And he can't make corrections if he doesn't know what's wrong with the edit. Which is probably why he asked you why you reverted his edit.--[[User:RossC|RossC]] 13:30, 12 November 2008 (EST)
:::Ed, what you quoted (and the entire section that was deleted) made ''perfect'' sense. It may not be highly technical, but it explained the two methods well, in a way anyone could understand. Can we just reinstate it, and perhaps improve it from there? [[User:Human|Human]] 17:05, 12 November 2008 (EST)
:::Ed, what you quoted (and the entire section that was deleted) made ''perfect'' sense. It may not be highly technical, but it explained the two methods well, in a way anyone could understand. Can we just reinstate it, and perhaps improve it from there? [[User:Human|Human]] 17:05, 12 November 2008 (EST)
:::: Ed I wasn't arguing, or suggesting I had the right to do anything. I just wanted to know what was wrong with what I had written. Your edit summary didn't say and you described my edit as 'nonsense' on my talk page.
:::: I believe that what I added was essentially correct. It could use more references, which I can add, and I may have over simplified things a bit. I find it tricky to write something that is understandable by a layman but also accurate and imformative. I
think this could easily be improved upon by multiple edits and collaboration. As it stands I think the article needs a lot of work. It gives an example which as far as I am aware does not yet exist outside the realm of science fiction, and then references an obscure work of fiction out of dozens that have been written on the subject (I personally prefer Prey by Micheal Crichton).--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 07:32, 19 November 2008 (EST)