Changes

:::: Ed I wasn't arguing, or suggesting I had the right to do anything. I just wanted to know what was wrong with what I had written. Your edit summary didn't say and you described my edit as 'nonsense' on my talk page.

:::: Ed I wasn't arguing, or suggesting I had the right to do anything. I just wanted to know what was wrong with what I had written. Your edit summary didn't say and you described my edit as 'nonsense' on my talk page.

:::: I believe that what I added was essentially correct. It could use more references, which I can add, and I may have over simplified things a bit. I find it tricky to write something that is understandable by a layman but also accurate and imformative. I

:::: I believe that what I added was essentially correct. It could use more references, which I can add, and I may have over simplified things a bit. I find it tricky to write something that is understandable by a layman but also accurate and imformative. I think this could easily be improved upon by multiple edits and collaboration. As it stands I think the article needs a lot of work. It gives an example which as far as I am aware does not yet exist outside the realm of science fiction, and then references an obscure work of fiction out of dozens that have been written on the subject (I personally prefer Prey by Micheal Crichton).--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 07:32, 19 November 2008 (EST)

think this could easily be improved upon by multiple edits and collaboration. As it stands I think the article needs a lot of work. It gives an example which as far as I am aware does not yet exist outside the realm of science fiction, and then references an obscure work of fiction out of dozens that have been written on the subject (I personally prefer Prey by Micheal Crichton).--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 07:32, 19 November 2008 (EST)