Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + +
Talk:Nanotechnology (view source)
Revision as of 18:33, November 26, 2008
, 18:33, November 26, 2008how to salvage this article
:::: I believe that what I added was essentially correct. It could use more references, which I can add, and I may have over simplified things a bit. I find it tricky to write something that is understandable by a layman but also accurate and imformative. I think this could easily be improved upon by multiple edits and collaboration. As it stands I think the article needs a lot of work. It gives an example which as far as I am aware does not yet exist outside the realm of science fiction, and then references an obscure work of fiction out of dozens that have been written on the subject (I personally prefer Prey by Micheal Crichton).--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 07:32, 19 November 2008 (EST)
:::: I believe that what I added was essentially correct. It could use more references, which I can add, and I may have over simplified things a bit. I find it tricky to write something that is understandable by a layman but also accurate and imformative. I think this could easily be improved upon by multiple edits and collaboration. As it stands I think the article needs a lot of work. It gives an example which as far as I am aware does not yet exist outside the realm of science fiction, and then references an obscure work of fiction out of dozens that have been written on the subject (I personally prefer Prey by Micheal Crichton).--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 07:32, 19 November 2008 (EST)
This article seems vague and speculative. Please describe work that has actually been done first. In the last section, you may describe future prospects. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:33, 26 November 2008 (EST)