4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 96:
Line 96: +
→Remove "ideologically motivated" tags: reply to JArneal
::::::::If the statements were accepted to be true, then you're right, they would not need citations. But they are not accepted to be true, which is the point of the argument in the first place! If FernoKlump thought it was common knowledge, he wouldn't have placed fact tags. --'' '''[[user:JArneal|<font color="#006666" >JArneal</font>]]''' '' 18:15, 19 November 2008 (EST)
::::::::If the statements were accepted to be true, then you're right, they would not need citations. But they are not accepted to be true, which is the point of the argument in the first place! If FernoKlump thought it was common knowledge, he wouldn't have placed fact tags. --'' '''[[user:JArneal|<font color="#006666" >JArneal</font>]]''' '' 18:15, 19 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::::JArneal, you're ignoring the point I already made, which is that they '''were''' accepted to be true, by Andy and the dozens of editors who have edited it in the half year it's existed. Ferno and you seem to be the only ones who suddenly have a craving to fact-tag the whole article and the more you insist to the contrary, the more it looks like [[deliberate ignorance]]. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 04:25, 21 November 2008 (EST)