4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 101:
Line 101: + +
→Remove "ideologically motivated" tags: found a cite, ferno
:Don't worry, Klump. You do good work, and you're raising a good point. My complaint is directed only at those who use fact-tagging as a form of drive-by shooting. I may even have been the person who created the {{tl|fact}} template; I don't remember clearly that far back. We frequently do need to back up '''what we think is right''', and we conservatives should not expect a free ride. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:03, 21 November 2008 (EST)
:Don't worry, Klump. You do good work, and you're raising a good point. My complaint is directed only at those who use fact-tagging as a form of drive-by shooting. I may even have been the person who created the {{tl|fact}} template; I don't remember clearly that far back. We frequently do need to back up '''what we think is right''', and we conservatives should not expect a free ride. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:03, 21 November 2008 (EST)
::Klump, I found a cite for the point you isolated as particularly unverifiable. It took me less than a minute to find and I'm sure I could find other examples just as easily. This is not an obscure or tenuous point that is being made... -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 14:09, 21 November 2008 (EST)
==Tags and locks==
==Tags and locks==