Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: − + Line 27:
Line 27: + +
no edit summary
==Annoyed==
==Working Together==
I have put serious time into crafting this page and I return to find it gutted. This is ridicules because Ed Poor doesn't like her, the page has turned to bunk. She is relevent for two reasons, one former atheist. Second reason, her works after conversion are remarkable enough to be cited by the Catholic Church. ....I know this is a collaborative project that anyone can change. But to absolutely ruin this page because somebody doesn't like her is wrong and not in the best interest of Conservapedia.--jpatt 19:22, 22 November 2008 (EST)
I have put serious time into crafting this page and I return to find it gutted. This is ridicules because Ed Poor doesn't like her, the page has turned to bunk. She is relevent for two reasons, one former atheist. Second reason, her works after conversion are remarkable enough to be cited by the Catholic Church. ....I know this is a collaborative project that anyone can change. But to absolutely ruin this page because somebody doesn't like her is wrong and not in the best interest of Conservapedia.--jpatt 19:22, 22 November 2008 (EST)
:::If you believe your information is valid and tastefully done, then you are allowed to reinsert it. If Ed states areas where he has difficulty with what you put, then you will have to work with him at that time to find an acceptable solution. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 21:21, 22 November 2008 (EST)
:::If you believe your information is valid and tastefully done, then you are allowed to reinsert it. If Ed states areas where he has difficulty with what you put, then you will have to work with him at that time to find an acceptable solution. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 21:21, 22 November 2008 (EST)
::::Thanks for addressing the issue I created. I feel like we shouldn't promote her past works which would include listing book titles, as I did originally (even though the author would disagree), eventually [[ISBN]]. Agreed removal? --jpatt 21:22, 22 November 2008 (EST)