Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + + + + +
well put, LT
::::Thanks for addressing the issue I created. I feel like we shouldn't promote her past works which would include listing book titles, as I did originally (even though the author would disagree), eventually [[ISBN]]. Agreed removal? --jpatt 21:22, 22 November 2008 (EST)
::::Thanks for addressing the issue I created. I feel like we shouldn't promote her past works which would include listing book titles, as I did originally (even though the author would disagree), eventually [[ISBN]]. Agreed removal? --jpatt 21:22, 22 November 2008 (EST)
One of the reasons I like starting over is that it provokes remarks like the following:
*Her recent works are villified now precisely because the darkness she fed on for so many years isn't in her stories any longer.
That sentence should be in the article! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:28, 22 November 2008 (EST)