Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Hussein reference: Not compelling at all and STILL NOT CENSORSHIP.
Line 71: Line 71:     
::Philip, I never made an "absolutist" claim in the entry that "Obama is a Muslim."  There is compelling factual evidence that Obama is a Muslim.  But your deletions (censorship) were of factual evidence, not of an absolutist claim.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:30, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 
::Philip, I never made an "absolutist" claim in the entry that "Obama is a Muslim."  There is compelling factual evidence that Obama is a Muslim.  But your deletions (censorship) were of factual evidence, not of an absolutist claim.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:30, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::: Andy, until Ed Poor edited it very recently, the article said "Obama is a Muslim", without any qualification.  At least some of the "compelling factual evidence" listed in the article is false, not compelling, and/or logically invalid, particularly the ones that I have been removing.  Andy why do you keep calling my deletions "censorship" when I have repeatedly denied that they are and explained why they are not, and you've not justified how they are?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:32, 27 November 2008 (EST)
    
==Debate On Obama's Religion==
 
==Debate On Obama's Religion==
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu