Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎The Truth is not always popular: Not a silly demand, so I still expect an apology; why can't you stop speculating about my beliefs?
Line 1,025: Line 1,025:     
::::::::::::: You're more than welcome to your views and we welcome many liberals to this site.  But you've advocated for [[gun control]] here and insisted that beauty is in the eye of the beholder (which is an atheistic viewpoint).  So I don't doubt that you hold some liberal beliefs.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:53, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 
::::::::::::: You're more than welcome to your views and we welcome many liberals to this site.  But you've advocated for [[gun control]] here and insisted that beauty is in the eye of the beholder (which is an atheistic viewpoint).  So I don't doubt that you hold some liberal beliefs.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:53, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 
+
::::::::::::::: As BRichtigen says below, the page refers to ''silly'' demands for apologies, which mine isn't.  So I still expect an apology for calling me a liberal.  (Incidentally, that point 55 is referenced to an article which doesn't mention apologies!)
 +
::::::::::::::: Contrary to the way that BRichtigen read your comment, I think that "here" referred to ''on Conservapedia'', not ''in the U.S.''.  But I'm not sure that I've even done that.  I've said that I ''support'' gun control, and argued against many of the arguments put against gun control, but I don't think I've ever "advocated for" it.  Neither did I "insist" that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  But again, you are discussing ''me'' rather than the ''issue'', and worse, ''speculating'' about my beliefs, rather than being prepared to say, "Philip, I accept that you are a conservative".  You seem to be implying that I'm a conservative who holds a few liberal beliefs, but you keep emphasising the speculated liberal beliefs and never acknowledge that I'm a conservative, which makes me wonder if you really do consider me a liberal.
 +
:::::::::::::::  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:56, 27 November 2008 (EST)
    
::::::::::::::*point 55 in [[liberal style]] refers to ''silly demands for apologies.'' I can't see anything silly on Philip J. Rayment's demand.
 
::::::::::::::*point 55 in [[liberal style]] refers to ''silly demands for apologies.'' I can't see anything silly on Philip J. Rayment's demand.
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu