604
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 562:
Line 562: + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse (view source)
Revision as of 14:40, December 1, 2008
, 14:40, December 1, 2008→Foxtrot and the Axiom of Choice
A five year block of a new user ''without any warning'' for removing information he thought (and which seems to be) incorrect? Are we ''trying'' to shut down Conservapedia? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:14, 28 November 2008 (EST)
A five year block of a new user ''without any warning'' for removing information he thought (and which seems to be) incorrect? Are we ''trying'' to shut down Conservapedia? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:14, 28 November 2008 (EST)
I think this is just ''bad style'':
# 14:49, 28 November 2008 Foxtrot (Talk | contribs) blocked AlanS (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 1 week (account creation disabled) (Violated 90/10 rule against talk, talk, talk)
*looking at the list of his contributions, AlanS hasn't violated the 90/10 guideline
*granted, he was involved in some discussions: it took a while to show that Foxtrot was wrong
*for the record: AlanS was right, Foxtrot was wrong, and AlanS is blocked...
Is this the way we want to perform discussions to improve the quality of our articles?
--[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:40, 1 December 2008 (EST)