Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 62: Line 62:     
-matt
 
-matt
 +
 +
ID avoids discussion of the proposed creator and does not even posit a supernatural creator. This means that ID would allow a mundane creator (admittedly with some fairly spectacular technology) while not eliminating a creators God.  To me ID fails as a serious scientific theory because they attempt to restrict an obvious line of study, that of the creator. While that IS a valid option in forming a hypothesis it would seem to be unusual. [[User:Markr|Markr]] 16:37, 1 December 2008 (EST)
401

edits

Navigation menu