Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
@TK: range blocks
Line 575: Line 575:     
:::I suppose that AlanS would like to do so. He hasn't done anything wrong, as far as I can see. --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:48, 1 December 2008 (EST)
 
:::I suppose that AlanS would like to do so. He hasn't done anything wrong, as far as I can see. --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:48, 1 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
==Range Blocks==
 +
TK, your range block of 81.210.0.0/16 blocked IPs of several central European (esp. German and Polish) internet provider. Your blockreason is:
 +
* ''Abusing multiple accounts: Blacklisted at multiple sites -- anon proxy''
 +
 +
My own provider at home uses a chunk of these numbers. This provider serves ~450,000 households and gives them fast internet access. Of course, a couple of the clients will allow nets like TOR to use their connection - that could count for the ''anon proxy'' part. But that will happen at most private providers. As the numbers are dynamic, multiple accounts are a possibility, though concurrent accounts should be very improbable.
 +
Is there any event which triggered this /16 block? Currently, I'm assigned one of these numbers at home, so I'd rather like this block to be lifted.
 +
 +
IMO, range blocks of this magnitude are more disruptive than productive.
 +
 +
--[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:43, 2 December 2008 (EST)
604

edits

Navigation menu