3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 608:
Line 608: +
Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse (view source)
Revision as of 22:17, December 2, 2008
, 22:17, December 2, 2008→Range Blocks: Not a forum for whingeing.
:::Of course, I care for ''the Poles and others'', as I'm one of them. I know that CP is American-centered, but I resent this high-handed approach to us few foreigners.
:::Of course, I care for ''the Poles and others'', as I'm one of them. I know that CP is American-centered, but I resent this high-handed approach to us few foreigners.
:::--[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 17:11, 2 December 2008 (EST)
:::--[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 17:11, 2 December 2008 (EST)
::::I too am non-American and have nothing but praise for the way that we are accommodated within the welcoming bounds of this fundamentally American project. I would add, BRichtigen, that this page is for issues to be noted, whereupon sysops will decide on the action to be atken. It is not a forum for malcontents to foregather and indulge in a good old whinge, whinge, whinge. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:17, 2 December 2008 (EST)
::::As I understand the range blocking system here, if you block a /16 range (81.210.0.0 to 81.210.255.255), you cannot go and unblock single IP's within that range. As I see the situation, you'd have to unblock the range and then finely tune a few block ranges that will not interfere with contributors. [[User:Jallen|Jallen]] 16:16, 2 December 2008 (EST)
::::As I understand the range blocking system here, if you block a /16 range (81.210.0.0 to 81.210.255.255), you cannot go and unblock single IP's within that range. As I see the situation, you'd have to unblock the range and then finely tune a few block ranges that will not interfere with contributors. [[User:Jallen|Jallen]] 16:16, 2 December 2008 (EST)