154
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 190:
Line 190: + +
Conservapedia talk:Obama straw poll (view source)
Revision as of 02:40, December 3, 2008
, 02:40, December 3, 2008→My response to compromise proposal
** Nevertheless, all I have tried to do ''so far'' is remove three spurious claims from that section. Only removing three spurious claims when I believe the section as a whole should be removed already is in effect a massive compromise. Yet the other side refuses to even accept ''that'' much! And at the same time they have the gall to accuse ''us'' of not accepting compromise!
** Nevertheless, all I have tried to do ''so far'' is remove three spurious claims from that section. Only removing three spurious claims when I believe the section as a whole should be removed already is in effect a massive compromise. Yet the other side refuses to even accept ''that'' much! And at the same time they have the gall to accuse ''us'' of not accepting compromise!
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:33, 2 December 2008 (EST)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:33, 2 December 2008 (EST)
:What I'm seeing is that both sides have several points they seem willing to compromise on and some they simply won't. For example, the posse is adamant that the "Obama will likely be the first muslim president" is important and relavent and they aren't going to let it be removed. On the other hand, maybe they will agree to move the section to the first slot underneath the contents box and just have a mention of the accusations in the top section. Then a series of counterclaims can be added by the clique underneath the current list. To me, that seems like a decent compromise that, while not making everyone happy, will at least help to allieviate some of the tension. --[[User:Bolly|Bolly]] 21:40, 2 December 2008 (EST)