Changes

:::::Philip said: ''Unless Andy agrees with a compromise, this is going nowhere''. Now does he mean, 'unless Andy cuts this Gordian knot'? Well, he has. Andy has made his views quite clear, and these are to support the status quo '''which is a compromise''': none of the points that Philip rages against are presented as facts, just as evidence to be considered. Given Philip's impenitent and rebellious behaviour, one is tempted to interpret  ''Unless Andy agrees with a compromise, this is going nowhere'' as ''Unless Andy does as I say'', which is totally unacceptable. Andy is the Leader of Conservapedia, and his views should be respected as those of teh ultimate arbiter. For Philip to carry on and on and on with this sterile debate is damaging Conservapedia, and leads one to question his motives in doing so. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 04:40, 3 December 2008 (EST)

:::::Philip said: ''Unless Andy agrees with a compromise, this is going nowhere''. Now does he mean, 'unless Andy cuts this Gordian knot'? Well, he has. Andy has made his views quite clear, and these are to support the status quo '''which is a compromise''': none of the points that Philip rages against are presented as facts, just as evidence to be considered. Given Philip's impenitent and rebellious behaviour, one is tempted to interpret  ''Unless Andy agrees with a compromise, this is going nowhere'' as ''Unless Andy does as I say'', which is totally unacceptable. Andy is the Leader of Conservapedia, and his views should be respected as those of teh ultimate arbiter. For Philip to carry on and on and on with this sterile debate is damaging Conservapedia, and leads one to question his motives in doing so. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 04:40, 3 December 2008 (EST)

== "You Say Tomato, I Say Tomatoe. Let's Call The Whole Thing Off" ==

== "You Say Tomato, I Say Tomatoe; Let's Call The Whole Thing Off!" ==

So far as many are concerned, this whole "debate", "argument" or "discussion" is pretty much moot. Andy has stated his reasoning, and as the 'Editor in Chief' of Conservapedia, that's it. People can continue to make this some kind of weird parlor game, an endless debating society, some sort of faux Wikipedia tribunal or commission if they want...  

So far as many are concerned, this whole "debate", "argument" or "discussion" is pretty much moot. Andy has stated his reasoning, and as the 'Editor in Chief' of Conservapedia, that's it. People can continue to make this some kind of weird parlor game, an endless debating society, some sort of faux Wikipedia tribunal or commission if they want...  

<u>OR</u> we can just simply ignore this bogus "issue" and leave the ''insurrectionists'' to scream into the wind. There is no argument without someone to argue with, right?  Silly and petty disputes, generated merely to satisfy the vain tyranny of someone who constantly demands to be right, never accepts any logical thought he doesn't agree with, are a giant time waster. The United Nations, with its endless talk, talk, talk is not something we aspire to emulate here.   

<u>OR</u> we can just simply ignore this bogus "issue" and leave the ''insurrectionists'' to scream into the wind. There is no argument without someone to argue with, right?  Silly and petty disputes, generated merely to satisfy the vain tyranny of someone who constantly demands to be right, never accepts any logical thought he doesn't agree with, are a giant time waster. The United Nations, with its endless talk, talk, talk is not something we aspire to emulate here.   

Wikipedia has countless thousands of pages of just such arguments stored away, and if this is someone's idea of being productive -- engaging in circular, repetitive and seemingly endless talk, talk, talk -- enjoy yourselves!  My suggestion is that we now call the game, and ignore people with closed minds, who are more interested in liberal political correctness, demanding to be made "right", demanding to be King of the Hill.  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font>^{<font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font>} 05:24, 3 December 2008 (EST)

Wikipedia has countless thousands of pages of just such arguments stored away, and if this is someone's idea of being productive -- engaging in circular, repetitive and seemingly endless talk -- enjoy yourselves!  My suggestion is that we now call the game, and ignore the people with closed minds, who are more interested in liberal political correctness, demanding to be made "right", demanding to be King of the Hill.  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font>^{<font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font>} 05:24, 3 December 2008 (EST)