nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 201:
Line 201: + + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Obama straw poll (view source)
Revision as of 13:55, December 3, 2008
, 13:55, December 3, 2008→My response to compromise proposal: False claims and hypocrisy.
:::::Philip said: ''Unless Andy agrees with a compromise, this is going nowhere''. Now does he mean, 'unless Andy cuts this Gordian knot'? Well, he has. Andy has made his views quite clear, and these are to support the status quo '''which is a compromise''': none of the points that Philip rages against are presented as facts, just as evidence to be considered. Given Philip's impenitent and rebellious behaviour, one is tempted to interpret ''Unless Andy agrees with a compromise, this is going nowhere'' as ''Unless Andy does as I say'', which is totally unacceptable. Andy is the Leader of Conservapedia, and his views should be respected as those of teh ultimate arbiter. For Philip to carry on and on and on with this sterile debate is damaging Conservapedia, and leads one to question his motives in doing so. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 04:40, 3 December 2008 (EST)
:::::Philip said: ''Unless Andy agrees with a compromise, this is going nowhere''. Now does he mean, 'unless Andy cuts this Gordian knot'? Well, he has. Andy has made his views quite clear, and these are to support the status quo '''which is a compromise''': none of the points that Philip rages against are presented as facts, just as evidence to be considered. Given Philip's impenitent and rebellious behaviour, one is tempted to interpret ''Unless Andy agrees with a compromise, this is going nowhere'' as ''Unless Andy does as I say'', which is totally unacceptable. Andy is the Leader of Conservapedia, and his views should be respected as those of teh ultimate arbiter. For Philip to carry on and on and on with this sterile debate is damaging Conservapedia, and leads one to question his motives in doing so. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 04:40, 3 December 2008 (EST)
:::::: "''...which is a compromise...''": Huh? How is that a "compromise"?
:::::: "''...none of the points that Philip rages against are presented as facts...''": Absolutely false, as I've already pointed out.
:::::: "''... one is tempted to interpret [Philip's comment] as ''Unless Andy does as I say'', which is totally unacceptable.''": Which totally ignores that it's not just ''my'' opinion, but that of many people including senior administrators, as has been repeatedly pointed out, but you keep ignoring or misrepresenting.
:::::: "''For Philip to carry on and on and on with this sterile debate is damaging Conservapedia...''": No, making false claims about Obama is damaging Conservapedia.
:::::: "''Andy is the Leader of Conservapedia, and his views should be respected ...''": I haven't mentioned this yet, but this is one of the most hypocritical claims in this issue. The hypocrisy is in decrying me for not respecting the leader, whilst the article grossly disrespects the leader-elect of the people posting this rubbish! (And no, it is not just fair criticism, which I don't have a problem with; it goes far beyond that.)
:::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:55, 3 December 2008 (EST)
== "You Say Tomato, I Say Tomatoe; Let's Call The Whole Thing Off!" ==
== "You Say Tomato, I Say Tomatoe; Let's Call The Whole Thing Off!" ==