5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 77:
Line 77: +
Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse (view source)
Revision as of 18:13, December 4, 2008
, 18:13, December 4, 2008→Interference and Collusiveness
:Simple questions are always okay. Rhetorical questions might not be. Using "simple questions" as a disguise for opening a debate about the rules is strictly out. Next time I see someone doing this - other than in the [[Debate Topics]] - he's gone. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:22, 4 December 2008 (EST)
:Simple questions are always okay. Rhetorical questions might not be. Using "simple questions" as a disguise for opening a debate about the rules is strictly out. Next time I see someone doing this - other than in the [[Debate Topics]] - he's gone. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:22, 4 December 2008 (EST)
::Personally I find the actual block the least important issue here. The most important issues are the flagrant breaches of the chain of command, the total lack of recourse on the off chance that abuse occurrs, and the likelyhood of an encouragement of off-site communication (which, to me, seems counter to the idea of having a wiki anyway; why else would the software include talk pages?) leading to an increased likelyhood of placing minors in an inapropriate position. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:13, 4 December 2008 (EST)