Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 95: Line 95:     
I received a short note regarding this article concerning some suggested improvements in grammar among other things.  I was a writing tutor at a university so I did some proofreading and found some areas where the article could be improved.  If anyone has any further input regarding this matter your comments would be appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:55, 15 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
 
I received a short note regarding this article concerning some suggested improvements in grammar among other things.  I was a writing tutor at a university so I did some proofreading and found some areas where the article could be improved.  If anyone has any further input regarding this matter your comments would be appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:55, 15 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
 +
 +
== This article is ridiculous ==
 +
Do we want credibility?  Do we want to be taken seriously in the world?  Do we want to get rid of the loony liberals that are ruining our country?  Then we need--at a bare minimum--to accept the basic laws of physics.  This article is a travesty, and it is one of the reasons why "conservative" has become synonymous with "bat shit crazy."  Can someone with half a brain and a decent understanding of the universe please fix this?  Conservative should not mean "idiot," it should simply mean "conservative."  Edmund Burke would be disgusted by you YECers. [[User:Scientz|Scientz]] 10:50 PM, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
13

edits

Navigation menu