Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 98: Line 98:  
== This article is ridiculous ==
 
== This article is ridiculous ==
 
Do we want credibility?  Do we want to be taken seriously in the world?  Do we want to get rid of the loony liberals that are ruining our country?  Then we need--at a bare minimum--to accept the basic laws of physics.  This article is a travesty, and it is one of the reasons why "conservative" has become synonymous with "bat shit crazy."  Can someone with half a brain and a decent understanding of the universe please fix this?  Conservative should not mean "idiot," it should simply mean "conservative."  Edmund Burke would be disgusted by you YECers. [[User:Scientz|Scientz]] 10:50 PM, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Do we want credibility?  Do we want to be taken seriously in the world?  Do we want to get rid of the loony liberals that are ruining our country?  Then we need--at a bare minimum--to accept the basic laws of physics.  This article is a travesty, and it is one of the reasons why "conservative" has become synonymous with "bat shit crazy."  Can someone with half a brain and a decent understanding of the universe please fix this?  Conservative should not mean "idiot," it should simply mean "conservative."  Edmund Burke would be disgusted by you YECers. [[User:Scientz|Scientz]] 10:50 PM, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:This article is ridiculous as it stands.  The article should restrict itself to decribing YEC, not refuting evolution...that is for another place. 
 +
Also, you state statistics that most Americans believe this, and that most scientists dont, then go on to say that consensus doesnt make it so.  So, I guess if the Americans that were polled agree that YEC is true, that it is, and if most scientists agree that it is false, well, they be godless wizards, see Leviticus 20.[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 21:04, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
1,660

edits

Navigation menu